Stagnation is Rough
I originally purchased the domain zmsy.co in early 2014 when I was first taking coding somewhat seriously and decided that having a personal webpage for my technical conquests was appropriate. However, seeing as it’s 2018 and I’ve only just now published it, I kicked the can a bit further than I was expecting to.
Hopefully others can glean some useful information from my mistakes that I made in the progress of doing it.
Version 1 - Django + Bootstrap (Late 2014)
Having put all of the intense, focused effort that is googling ‘python web framework’ in 2014, Django was tops and Flask had only been recently announced. At this point I had absolutely zero serious web development under my belt, so I was using the copy and paste from Stack Overflow method of development. What came of this was not pretty, and fortunately I’ve burned all the evidence.
What I Learned
- Node, node, node - In trying to use Bootstrap and a few other js dependencies, I found node.js and how npm worked. This was the first real exposure I had to any other cli + package manager system outside python.
- SCSS - Oh man, you can write
$orangeand place it everywhere? Heck yes you can.
- jQuery DOM selection - While the current version of this site doesn’t use jQuery, I learned a lot by using the dom selection methods from jQuery. The
- Responsiveness - Going into this version, I was still used to
m.blank.comstyle mobile pages. Seeing Bootstrap respond to different breakpoints really changed how I see mobile development working.
I never really got a grasp on anything at this point, to be quite honest. I was using a Bootstrap template that I was trying to populate with information. I used the HTML5 Boilerplate as a basis for what I was doing, but it harmed my efforts in the end since it added a lot of noise that I didn’t understand. As a total web dev beginner, this was a mistake.
Version 2 - Flask + Bootstrap (2015)
This version was very similar to Django, except for the fact that I was using Flask instead. Fundamentally, I still wasn’t sure of what I was looking for, other than the fact that I needed a website, and that Flask/Django are supposed to be used to make websites. Considering I had no idea what media queries were at this point, and that I needed to find something that would at least get me the majority of the way towards what I was going for, Bootstrap was an appealing option.
What I Learned
- Bootstrap - This is probably a bit overkill for a personal blog, but at the time that I was making this version it seemed that basically everything was based on Bootstrap.
- Grid Layouts - Grids are super, super, super, super useful. Seeing how I was never particularly sure how I should layout my site, the most useful part of a grid for me was giving me a decision structure that I could look at the stuff on the site and say “This should go here”. It simplifies the terrifyingly open-ended process of creating a page from scratch.
- Database Interaction - The majority of my job for several years now has been interacting with databases, but the prospect of doing that from an application server had never really occurred to me. Using an application to regularly write information to the database brings with a whole host of new problems that are never really encountered if you’re not using a database for production purposes.
Version 3 - Flask + Bulma (2016 / 2017)
What I Learned:
- Web Servers Are Still A Thing - Deploying to a real web server meant that I could no longer just the
app.run()method that came with Flask. People use these alongside a normal webserver like nginx/apache? That’s nuts!
- Docker - Containerization! Even though my final website I created was just flat files, this version was basically one that made it so that I could use a Docker container with nginx installed, add all of my dependencies, and then run it and have it work every time.
- Gulp - This was the first build tool that I ended up using, and its straightforward nature was excellent. Found it easy to pick up, and very powerful. The chaining of commands was really an excellent way of introducing myself to frontend build systems.
Version 4 - Lektor + Bulma (2018)
This is the version that I finally got right. The thing that I was missing on the earlier versions is that I’m going to be regularly interacting with this site and changing the information on it. I didn’t want to have to program all the aspects of that myself, so I decided to switch over to some sort of CMS. At work, I had recently used Jekyll to create an internal web site, so I decided to switch over to Lektor, which bills itself as a flat file CMS.
I primarily chose a static site generator mostly because I want people to have fast load times, I didn’t want to have to care about a database and managing the migration/upgrades, and that it had an easier deployment path.
Static Site Generator? What’s That?
A static site generator takes many of the innovations of dynamic web frameworks and uses that logic to be able to render things out to flat files for serving up using a web server.
- Models - You define types of pages by creating a model, which defines which data fields will be contained therein.
- Templates - These are the HTML layouts that a model’s content gets populated into.
- Content - This is the individual pieces of content that make their way onto the website. Oftentimes, these are either markdown blog posts or some other type of generated content.
Conceptually, this was all super familiar to me from using Jinja2 in Flask, using a database to represent both the model (database schema) and the content (database rows).
What I Learned When I Finally Made a Version Worth Deploying
- Static Sites Generators - They’re stupid easy to deploy. I can basically have a CI tool do the build and then push the files up to the web server and that’s it. No database is good when you don’t have a particular need for one.
- Lektor - This particular SSG has its own editing interface you can use to write things, so it makes creating new blog posts easy. I’m planning on trying to learn it well enough to be able to contribute back at some point.
- Webpack - Similar to how I was using gulp, I’ve switched to Webpack as a learning opportunity, and because it has a good integration with Lektor. At first impression, I really hated the config system I was using in 2.x and 3.x, but was a fan of the tool itself. Fortunately, Webpack 4 has just released with it’s 0-config option, so I decided to use it. I found this webpack 4 tutorial very helpful.
Version 5 - The Switch to Jekyll Approaches (2018…?)
Jekyll is and has always been the grandaddy of all static site generators, and the support from its plugin ecosystem far eclipses that of a smaller project like Lektor. Primarily, I am a fan of the editing interface and models / templating system (Jinja2 is still my favorite) in Lektor. Jekyll, however, has a lot more eyes on it and gets a lot more love from a maintenance perspective.
I gained a lot along the way though - the Jekyll portion will only render the static files that create the site itself. The next version of this site is going to a separate Flask API running on a different server, which will serve up data and information for the interactive Projects page.